Uncovering the Core Ideas and Assertions of German New Medicine (GNM), Alongside Analysis of Its Scientific Validity

German New Medicine (GNM), an alternative medical theory developed by Ryke Geerd Hamer in the late 1970s, claims that diseases, including cancer, arise from unresolved psychological conflicts which produce distinct biological "laws." However, this theory, with its radical "Five Biological Laws," remains unsupported by empirical evidence and is generally disregarded by the scientific and medical community.

According to GNM, diseases progress through two phases: conflict active and healing. The theory proposes that each trauma activates specific brain areas that correspond to particular organs or tissues. Despite these claims, there is no credible empirical evidence supporting these core claims, and the scientific and medical community regards GNM as lacking rigorous clinical trials or validated biological data that would substantiate its fundamental principles.

Mainstream medical science finds GNM lacking reproducible scientific data, controlled clinical trials, and peer-reviewed research to support its theories or efficacy. Systematic reviews on integrating scientific evidence into health policymaking prioritize interventions supported by reproducible data and peer-reviewed studies; GNM is not included or recognized in such evidence-based compendia.

The German Research Foundation (DFG) and leading medical faculties focus on evidence-based diagnostics and therapeutics grounded in established biomedical sciences, contrasting with GNM's speculative assertions. Clinical consensus and modern medical digital health technologies continue to rely on validated research and digital twins to model and predict disease, underscoring the lack of scientific foundation for GNM's biological laws.

GNM practitioners focus on identifying and resolving the emotional conflicts they believe underlie physical symptoms. However, the theory ignores the complex interplay of genetics, environment, infections, and lifestyle factors crucial to disease causation. For instance, the well-documented Olivia Pilhar case and dozens of deaths in Spain have been linked to GNM, highlighting its potential harm.

Ryke Geerd Hamer was investigated and convicted in several European countries for malpractice and illegal medical practice, spending prison terms in Germany and France related to these actions. Claims that authorities are lying to silence him and that his medical license was revoked to protect profits from conventional medicine are not supported by credible evidence. In reality, Dr. Hamer lost his medical license due to malpractice related to endorsing GNM and neglecting conventional treatments, which resulted in patient deaths.

Evidence-based medicine, grounded in extensive research and clinical validation, remains essential for diagnosing and treating diseases safely and effectively. Leading health authorities and cancer research centers warn against relying on GNM instead of evidence-based therapies, citing risks of harm and fatal outcomes. It is crucial for individuals to seek medical advice from reputable sources and to be wary of unproven theories that may put their health at risk.

References: [1] National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ [2] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/ [3] World Health Organization (WHO). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.who.int/ [5] German Research Foundation (DFG). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.dfg.de/

This article is intended for informational purposes only and does not replace professional medical advice. Always consult with a healthcare professional for any medical concerns.

Despite claims that diseases like cancer arise from unresolved psychological conflicts by the German New Medicine (GNM), this alternative theory remains unsupported by empirical evidence and is generally disregarded by the scientific and medical community.
The progression of diseases through the two phases, conflict active and healing, as per GNM, lack credible empirical evidence, and it fails to meet the standards of medical science, which emphasizes evidence-based diagnostics and therapeutics.
Systematic reviews on health policymaking prioritize interventions that are grounded in reproducible data and peer-reviewed studies, making GNM an unacknowledged approach in evidence-based compendia.
GNM's focus on resolving emotional conflicts underlying physical symptoms ignores the complex interplay of genetics, environment, infections, and lifestyle factors critical to disease causation, leading to potential harm and numerous documented instances of death.
Leading medical authorities and cancer research centers advocate for evidence-based therapies over unproven theories like GNM due to the risks involved, urging individuals to seek advice from reputable sources instead.

Uncovering the Core Ideas and Assertions of German New Medicine (GNM), Alongside Analysis of Its Scientific Validity