Skip to content

Organ donation: Should it be an 'opt-in' (individual consent required) or 'opt-out' (consent assumed unless otherwise stated) approach?

Organ donation: Should it be an 'opt-in' (requiring explicit consent) or 'opt-out' (automatically enrolling individuals unless they opt-out) system?

Every 10 minutes, a fresh patient joins the queue for an organ transplant in the United States.
Every 10 minutes, a fresh patient joins the queue for an organ transplant in the United States.

Organ donation policies across the globe differ significantly, raising the question of whether an opt-in or opt-out system is more effective. To explore this, a team of researchers from the UK examined the organ donation protocols of 48 countries over a 13-year period.

In an opt-in system, individuals must actively register to donate their organs after death. In contrast, opt-out systems assume that organ donation will occur unless a specific request is made to prevent it.

Prof. Eamonn Ferguson, the lead author from the University of Nottingham, acknowledges that such systems rely on people making an active decision, which can lead to drawbacks like procrastination, loss aversion, or assuming that policy-makers have made the correct decision.

However, inaction in an opt-in system could mean those who wish to donate never do so (a false negative). Conversely, inaction in an opt-out system might result in someone who does not wish to donate becoming a donor (a false positive).

The United States currently utilizes an opt-in system. Last year, 28,000 transplants were made possible due to organ donors, with around 79 people receiving organ transplants every single day. Sadly, about 18 people die each day due to a shortage of donated organs.

Researchers from the Universities of Nottingham, Stirling, and Northumbria analyzed the donation systems of 48 countries. Countries using opt-out systems showed higher total numbers of kidneys donated - the organ that the majority of people on organ transplant lists are waiting for. Opt-out systems also had a greater overall number of organ transplants.

Opt-in systems, on the other hand, had a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors. However, the influence of policy on living donation rates has never been reported before.

The study's authors recognize that their research had limitations, such as not distinguishing between different degrees of opt-out legislation and not considering other factors influencing organ donation.

The researchers suggest that their results, which were published in BMC Medicine, indicate that opt-out consent may lead to an increase in deceased donations but a reduction in living donation rates. They also suggest that opt-out consent is associated with an increase in the total number of livers and kidneys transplanted.

They recommend that future decisions on policy could be informed by their results, but these results could be strengthened further through the routinely collected and publicly available international organ donation information, such as consent type, procurement procedures, and hospital bed availability.

Prof. Ferguson suggests that future studies could examine the beliefs, wishes, and attitudes of individuals when it comes to deciding to opt in or opt out. This research could provide a greater understanding of the impact of consent legislation on organ donation and transplantation rates.

Countries using opt-out consent still experience organ donor shortages, so completely changing the system is unlikely to solve the problem. They suggest that consent legislation or adopting aspects of the "Spanish Model" could be ways to improve donor rates.

Spain currently has the highest organ donation rate in the world. Their success is attributed to measures such as a transplant coordination network that operates both locally and nationally, and the provision of high-quality public information about organ donation.

Recently, questions have arisen about the possibility of farming animal organs for human transplants as a potential solution to the organ shortage. However, this remains a complex issue that requires further investigation and consideration.

  1. The study, published in BMC Medicine, suggests that opt-out consent may lead to an increase in deceased organ donations but a reduction in living donation rates.
  2. Researchers recommend that future decisions on policy could be informed by their results, but these could be strengthened further through the collection and analysis of international organ donation information.
  3. In contrast to opt-out systems, opt-in systems have a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors, although the influence of policy on living donation rates has never been reported before.
  4. Paxlovid, a potent antiviral treatment, may play a significant role in managing medical conditions related to COVID-19. However, its effectiveness in the context of health-and-wellness and organ transplantations remains a subject of ongoing scientific research.

Read also:

    Latest