Skip to content

Magistrates in Romania will witness an increase in their retirement age to 65 years, with retirement benefits being capped.

At a press meeting on July 29, Ilie Bolojan, the prime minister of Romania, detailed the primary components of the magistrates' pension reform plan, set to feature in the third fiscal package. Notable points include increasing the retirement age and setting a limit on pension amounts. The...

Romania is planning to increase the retirement age for magistrates to 65 years and impose a limit...
Romania is planning to increase the retirement age for magistrates to 65 years and impose a limit on magistrate pensions.

Magistrates in Romania will witness an increase in their retirement age to 65 years, with retirement benefits being capped.

Romania's Magistrates' Pension Reform: Aims to Strengthen the Justice System

The Romanian government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan, has proposed a reform to the magistrates' pension system. The reform, presented on July 29, aims to address unclear public system salary laws and ensure a uniform, fast, and efficient judiciary process.

The proposed reform includes several key changes. Firstly, the retirement age for magistrates will be raised from the current 48 years to 65 years. Secondly, the minimum required service length will increase from 25 to 35 years. Thirdly, pensions for magistrates will be capped at no more than 70% of their net salary, not the previously proposed 80% of the gross salary.

The reform also emphasizes the need for a salary law that eliminates ambiguities. This is in response to the over 20,000 legal actions initiated by people working in the justice system, regarding social discrimination, the granting of bonuses, unsuitable working conditions, or administrative acts validated by court rulings. The financial effects of these lawsuits have been enormous for the Romanian state, amounting to RON 10 billion (EUR 2 billion).

The prime minister highlighted that the actual calculation method for pensions is a problem for sustainability in the coming years due to a lack of people to replace retiring magistrates. Currently, the proposed pension calculation would be based on a percentage of 55% of the average of the last 7 years, but not more than 70% of the net salary.

The reform is urgent and necessary, according to the official, to avoid losing over EUR 800 million from the National Recovery and Resilience facility. The government aims to create a justice system made out of mature professionals. The majority of magistrates in Romania retire at the age of 47-49 years old.

The Supreme Council of the Magistrates has strongly opposed these proposed pension changes, arguing they violate constitutional principles and could harm the justice system. However, the government and Justice Minister maintain that the reform is essential for sustainability and fairness.

The reform also includes increasing the minimum length of service to 35 years for magistrates. Pensions in the Romanian justice system currently amount to around EUR 5,000 net. Ilie Bolojan noted that too-early retirement of magistrates is a significant problem in the special pension system. The current calculation of pensions in the justice system is based on gross income, but it is proposed to use net income instead.

The grants and loans guaranteed by the European Commission hinge on a series of reforms that Romania has to complete. The magistrates' pension reform is one of these necessary steps towards a stronger, more efficient, and fairer justice system in Romania.

  1. The proposed magistrates' pension reform in Romania, an essential step towards a stronger justice system, aims to address not only unclear public system salary laws but also extends to the broader field of general-news, where the reform could potentially impact the economy.
  2. In light of the enormous financial effects of over 20,000 legal actions initiated by people working in the justice system, amounting to RON 10 billion (EUR 2 billion), the reform proposals delve into the finance and business arena with changes in retirement age, required service length, and pension caps.
  3. As the reform faces opposition from the Supreme Council of the Magistrates, it is necessary to consider the ramifications in political circles. The government's decision to press forward with the reform, despite opposition, highlights its commitment towards a more efficient health-and-wellness sector, as pension reform can influence the overall well-being of magistrates.

Read also:

    Latest