Skip to content

Court Issues Decision in First Hearing

RWE vs. Anden-Bauer: Court Issues Judgment

Today, the Hamm Regional Court makes its ruling in the climate lawsuit brought against energy...
Today, the Hamm Regional Court makes its ruling in the climate lawsuit brought against energy company RWE by Peruvian farmer and mountain climber Saul Luciano Lliuya.

RWE Challenged in Court by Anden-Bauer: Judgment Pronounced - Court Issues Decision in First Hearing

German Court Rules Against Peruvian Farmer in Climate Lawsuit Against RWE

The Higher Regional Court of Hamm in Germany has dismissed the appeal of Peruvian farmer Saúl Luciano Lliuya in a landmark climate lawsuit against energy giant RWE. The court ruled that Lliuya failed to establish a serious threat of damage to his property due to potential flooding from the Palcacocha glacier lake in Huaraz, Peru.

Lliuya, a farmer and mountain guide, had sought to hold RWE liable for contributing to costs for protective measures against a potential flood wave. He claimed that the company's greenhouse gas emissions were partially responsible for the danger posed to his home in Huaraz. Lliuya's lawsuit, supported by the Future Sustainability Foundation and Germanwatch, was considered legally inadmissible by RWE.

In a hearing in March, expert witnesses testified that Lliuya's property was unlikely to be significantly affected by flooding or a mudslide within the next 30 years. They estimated the probability of such events at only one percent. Lliuya's lawyers disputed these findings, arguing that the witnesses had underestimated the risk.

A motion for recusal against one of the expert witnesses was denied, leading to a postponement of the initial decision date from April 14 to May 28.

The court's decision marks a setback for efforts by German NGOs and Lliuya to establish a legal precedent holding individual companies like RWE liable for climate change-related damages under German law. The court highlighted that establishing a causal link between specific emitters' CO₂ emissions and the alleged danger to a property is currently unfeasible due to the vast number of polluters and the compliance of companies with relevant regulations. Such liability, the court argued, would have unforeseeable consequences for Germany as an industrial location.

In summary, the Higher Regional Court of Hamm has rejected Lliuya's case, concluding there is no immediate danger to his property and denying the creation of a precedent for corporate climate liability in this context.

  • Keywords: RWE, Climate Change, Higher Regional Court of Hamm, Climate Lawsuit, Saúl Luciano Lliuya, Palcacocha, Huaraz, Germany, Flood Wave, Energy Corporation, Germanwatch.
  1. This dismissal of the climate lawsuit by the Higher Regional Court of Hamm against RWE may put a temporary hold on the development of energy policy regarding corporate liability for climate change-related damages, raising questions about the future of energy policy in addressing climate change.
  2. Scientists and environmental organizations might consider the implications of the ruling on Saúl Luciano Lliuya's climate lawsuit against RWE, as it could affect health-and-wellness and fitness-and-exercise routines in rural areas that rely on a stable climate for sustainability.
  3. The court's decision in Lliuya's case highlights the complexity of assigning responsibility for climate change-induced disasters in light of the vast number of polluters, which calls for international collaboration on climate science and collective action to curb greenhouse gas emissions, thus bolstering the global community's response to climate change.

Read also:

    Latest